"On Trayvon Martin; Applying the Trayvon Martin litmus test to other events around the Country."

Every day in the United States is marred by the unnecessary and senseless killing of citizens, by citizens.  According to the FBI Uniform Crime Statistics (1), in 2010 (the most recent statistics published) there were approximately 14,748 murders within the US; in comparison, in 1960 (the first year statistics were kept) there were 9,110 murders.

While this appears to be a paltry increase in the number of murders, in comparison to the increase of population (179,323,175 persons in 1960 - 308,745,538 in 2010 (2)), it appears as though violent crime has diminished remarkably.

This is the case when looking at "murder," however, when we simply look past the terminology we see a clearly defined effort on the part of the FBI to manipulate those numbers in many ways.

However, that is incidental to what I am writing about.

With 14,748 actual confirmed murders in 2010, the statistic shows us that there is an average of 40.4 murders per day within the US.  Of those murders approximately 65% are solved (3); for those that remain unsolved, the likelihood of discovering the murderer in the future diminishes drastically after the first year.

It is generally believed that the majority of unsolved murders are related to organized crime, street gangs, and persons whom were actively engaged in criminal enterprise; as such, no great effort is generally spent in trying to find their killers; the traditional wisdom being that people who live in that world will eventually either get caught by the police, or killed by a rival gang/enterprise.

However, when we look to the crime statistics of the United States, we begin to see clear and convincing evidence to show that while the vast majority of unsolved murders ARE criminal-on-criminal, there are still many that can't be classified as such.

Victims with no criminal past, no known enemies; victims whom have no great wealth or power or fame.  Victims whom are deprived of their lives for motives nobody can understand; they are simply found dead with no explanation.

When we begin to extrapolate the data, however, even the most casual of observers begins to see a series of deeply disturbing coincidences, possible coverups, obfuscations, a clear lack of desire on the part of the police to investigate, and one more thing that is NEVER spoken about publicly...

The race of the victim in comparison to the perpetrator.

It is not my intention to race-bait; nor am I interested in summoning up bigotry, hatred or to attempt to make any group look as though its inherently criminal or endemically violent.

It IS my intention to clearly and unambiguously document the conspiracy within Law Enforcement to manipulate the statistics used to judge their performance, the overt actions of certain groups and individuals to "color" crime; noting that "Karl, 36" is black IS NOT RACIST.  Its a "description."  How do you describe a person to another who's never seen him?  "His name is Karl, 36, 6'1", 205 lbs, black hair, brown eyes, dark complexion." 

For the purpose of complete disclosure on this topic, I will now introduce crime statistics according to race; these numbers come from FBI Uniform Reports and has been extrapolated by  New Century Foundation a 501(c)(3) organization founded in 1994 to study immigration and race relations so as to better understand the consequences of America's increasing diversity. (4)

http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf

Draw your own conclusions.






(1) http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats
(2) http://2010.census.gov/news/releases/operations/cb10-cn93.html
(3) http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/crime/unsolved-murder-rate-increasing
(4) http://www.colorofcrime.com/